Khadi vs Sureshbhai
Judges:
22 February, 2012·1. When the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, Mr. Mishra, learned advocate for the respondent is not present. Mr. Bhatt, learned advocate appearing with Mrs. Bhatt, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that Manager of the petitioner trust is present in Court so that the p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshbhai vs Commissioner
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Notice returnable on 12.3.2012. Direct service permitted.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pragneshbhai vs Appearance :
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Notice returnable on 28.02.2012.Ms.Krina Calla, learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent nos.1,2 and 3.Direct service is permitted qua respondent nos.4 to 6.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parulben vs Harshaben
Judges:
22 February, 2012·In view of the order passed earlier dated 16.02.2012, affidavit has been filed, which suggests that communication gap is resulted not delay.Therefore, considering the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of judgment including the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Stat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Natubhai vs State
Judges:
22 February, 2012·By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with M.Case No.1 of 2011 registered with Limbasi Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anopsinh vs State
Judges:
22 February, 2012·The petitioner by way of this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the order of transfer dated 4/8/2011.Mr.HH Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has already made a representation and as per the ratio laid down by the Division Bench of this ...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Khetaram
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Mr.A.Y. Oza, learned counsel states that he appears on behalf of respondent no. 3.Heard.The ad-interim relief granted vide order dated 29.12.2011 stands confirmed on the same terms. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Rule is made absolute.First Appeal to be listed for hearing on 21.03.2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maheshkumar vs Rekhaben
Judges:
22 February, 2012·On having heard learned advocate for the applicant and also learned advocate for the original opponent. It emerges that the respondent No 33 has passed away on 2nd June 2009. This application is preferred to bring the only heir of respondent No 33 who is the sister of the deceased Ms Jagruti Patel. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Learned
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Learned AGP states under instructions of Mr. G.V. Baria, Incharge Principal, Aadarsh Nivasi Shala (8), Chhota Udepur that the respondent workman shall be paid Rs.38,475/- towards arrears of 17B wages which will complete arrears till 31.1.2012 and this money will be paid on or before 29.3.2012. Put u...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hanif vs Abdula
Judges:
22 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned Advocate Mr. Antani stated that the learned Senior Counsel Shri Mihir Joshi appears for learned Advocate Shri Chhaya for the appellants. To be placed before the Bench in which one of us (Akil Kureshi,J.) is not a member.(Akil Kureshi,J.) (C.L.Soni,J...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.