Chotubha vs Narpatsinh
Judges:
12 April, 2012·Learned Advocate Ms. Khushboo Shah appearing for Mr V C Vaghela, learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, states that Chotubha Khetubha Vaghela, the applicant/original complainant has expired. Hence this matter stands disposed of as abated. Rule is discharged. Learned APP is at liberty t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai vs Special
Judges:
12 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI) Applicant has prayed for condoning the delay of 866 days in filing first appeal. The applicant has stated in the application that previously Special Civil Application was filed challenging the judgment and award passed by the reference court. However, the said...
High Court Of Gujarat
Suhash vs State
Judges:
12 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard learned counsel Mr.Shirish Joshi assisted by learned advocate Mr.Baiju Joshi for the applicant, learned AGP Mr.N.J.Shah for the respondent No.1 to 3, and learned advocate Mr.Shital Patel for the respondent No.4.Learned counsel for the applicant is pres...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chintan vs State
Judges:
12 April, 2012·It is submitted by learned APP that Investigating Officer is awaiting for FSL report. Stand over to 24.04.2012. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.Copy of this order be provided to learned APP.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Wilayatali vs Mohd
Judges:
12 April, 2012·During the course of hearing , both the sides have jointly requested this Court to direct expeditious hearing of the Regular Civil Suit No. 393 of 2004. Keeping in mind the disputes between the parties, request is acceded to. The trial court is directed to hear and dispose of the same as far as poss...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Union
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt
12 April, 2012·Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners has contended that in view of the definition contained in sub-section 37A of Section 2 of the Railways Act, 1989, "the special railway project" means a project and is a project to be completed within a specified time frame. This being an essential part ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Nirmalaben
Judges:
12 April, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 22.11.2005, present respondent Nos.1 to 3 preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.285 of 2007 under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Vadodara. The said claim petition was allowe...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Vasantrai
Judges:
12 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) In view of the same judgment impugned herein having been carried in appeal in LPA No.1753 of 2011 and another Division Bench having already clarified the issue of liability of respective parties while disposing of that appeal on 16.01.2012, the present appea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shobhaben vs State
Judges:
12 April, 2012·Mr.Jasani, learned advocate for the petitioner, has submitted that in one set of matters, he received reply affidavit while in other two cases reply affidavit is yet not received. He also requested for adjournment on the said ground, i.e. to take instructions with reference to reply affidavit and to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Ode
Judges:
12 April, 2012·Heard Mr. Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioners.Mr.Majmudar has submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw present petition as the petitioners intend to pursue the representations made by them. He also requested for appropriate observations requiring the respondent to consi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.