Dr.Surendra Ranganath vs The Branch Manager
Judges:
20 September, 2017·The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein jointly and severally to refund/repay the amount lying in Account bearing No.10831322350, estimated to be Rs.26,72,000/- and Term Deposit Bond Ledger A/c.No.221 of a su...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.25085 Of 2017 vs 6 N.Murugesappa
Judges:
20 September, 2017·Mr.S.Navaneethan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 ...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19836 Of 2017 vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
20 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent police to register the case based on the complaint dated 01.05.2011.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complaint given by him on...
Madras High Court
K Saraswathi vs The Commissioner Of Revenue Administration And Others
Judges: M Venugopal, P D Audikesavalu
20 September, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL, J.] The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has made an endorsement in W.P.No.25121 of 2017 to the following effect: “The petitioner withdraws the Writ Petition”Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the present Writ Petition is ...
Madras High Court
Amaravathi Old Ayacut Agriculturist Association ( Regd No 46/96 ) 45 vs The Secretary To Government And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
20 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.Nos.22985 & 22986 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.27805 & 27806 of 2004 Amaravathi Old Ayacut Agriculturist Association (Regd.No.46/96) 45, Karur Main Road, Kallipalayam (Post) Erode District - 638 ...
Madras High Court
C Rukmani vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
20 September, 2017·Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has already become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infru...
Madras High Court
P A Palanimuthu vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police
Judges: M Dhandapani
20 September, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted as follows:“The petition filed against the charge memo. The day petitioner was 54 years. Now he attend superannuation. So the writ petition became infructuous”.M.DHANDAPANI, J.vv/kas and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.Recording the endor...
Madras High Court
K Krishnan vs The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board
Judges: M Dhandapani
20 September, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has vacated the premises, hence, the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.M.DHANDAPANI, J.vv/kas 2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the p...
Madras High Court
Tamilnadu Water Supply And Drainage Board Accounts Officials Association 31 vs Tamil Nadu Water Supply And Drainage Board And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
20 September, 2017·Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and...
Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Central Excise vs The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, V Bhavani Subbaroyan
20 September, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN C.M.A.No.2715 of 2015 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai III Commissionerate, Chennai. .. Appellant versus1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep., by its Superintending Eng...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.