Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P A Palanimuthu vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police

Madras High Court|20 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted as follows:
“The petition filed against the charge memo. The day petitioner was 54 years. Now he attend superannuation. So the writ petition became infructuous”.
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
vv/kas and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
20.09.2017 vv/kas To The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Trichy Range, Trichy – 620 001.
W.P.No.21646 of 2004
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P A Palanimuthu vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.