Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C Rukmani vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government And Others

Madras High Court|20 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has already become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
20.09.2017 tsi To
1. Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2. Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
W.P.No.13988 of 2005
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C Rukmani vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.