Devianaiammmal ( Deceased ) S Manonmani vs V M Ganesan And Others
Judges: M Govindaraj
22 September, 2017·Aggrieved over the long pendency of the Execution Application in E.A.No.70 of 2010 in E.P.No.220 of 2008 in O.S.No.262 of 1964, the petitioner has come before this Court with this Civil Revision Petition.2. The petitioner has obtained the decree as early as on 09.08.1971 and she filed the Executio...
Madras High Court
G Balasubramanian vs The Tahsildar Cum Executive Magistrate And Others
Judges: A D Jagadish Chandira
22 September, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in E3/3203/10 dated 10.08.2010 under Section 145 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and quash the same.2. The petitioner is arrayed as 'A' Party No.1 in the p...
Madras High Court
Balaji Motion Pictures Limited C 13 vs 1 Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited Bharath Sanchar Bhavan Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited 5 Th Floor Mahanagar Doorsanchar Sadan 9
Judges: Anita Sumanth
22 September, 2017·Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff seeks permission to withdraw the suit and makes an endorsement to this effect. Accordingly, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected applications are closed. No Costs.22.09.2017 msv Dr.Anita Sumanth,J msv C.S.No.315 of 2017 Original Appl...
Madras High Court
S K Logesh Kumar ( Minor ) Rep By Father Natural Guardina Dr M Saravana Kumar vs The Principal And Others
Judges: Rajiv Shakder, Abdul Quddhose
22 September, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDER, J)1. As directed by us, in the previous order dated 21.09.2017, the first respondent has filed an affidavit. In the affidavit, what was indicated before us in the proceedings held on 21.09.2017, has been set forth.2. We may, however, note that in the...
Madras High Court
N Kannammal And Others vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta in the name of the petiti...
Madras High Court
Senthil Kumar [ vs The Special Commissioner For Handicapped And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 3 and Mr.T.C.Gopalakrishnan, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner has...
Madras High Court
T K Saravanan vs V Somasekaran
Judges: M Govindaraj
22 September, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 30.09.2016 passed in I.A.No.10721 of 2016 in O.S.No.3457 of 2016 by the learned XVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.2. Heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.3. The parties ha...
Madras High Court
T Vedagiri vs The Assistant Sub Divisional Engineer
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·Mr.S.Diwakar, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondent from demolishing and evicting the petit...
Madras High Court
M G Udayakumaran vs The Revenue Divisional Officer And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·Mr.Era Premnath, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 1st respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's appeal dated...
Madras High Court
M S Palanivel vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's repres...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.