K.Punitha vs The Chief Engineer
Judges:
14 March, 2017·Though the writ petitioner has filed this writ petition for issuing a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is issued to consider the petitioner's...
Madras High Court
Kalaiselvi vs State Represented Through
Judges:
14 March, 2017·The sixth respondent registered a case in Crime No.4 of 2014 on 17.10.2014 and after completing the investigation, has filed a charge sheet before the Special Court for TNPID Act Cases, Madurai, in C.C.No.11 of 2015, for offences under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5 ...
Madras High Court
K.Deivendran vs The Additional Chief Secretary/
Judges:
14 March, 2017·The petitioner joined in the Revenue Department as Junior Assistant on 10.10.1985 and he was promoted in various categories in the Revenue Department. While, he was working as Deputy Collector/General Manager, TASMAC in Karur District, he was issued with the charge memo dated 15.04.2015, under Rule ...
Madras High Court
Deepan vs The District Collector
Judges:
14 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the brother of the detenu Karthick S/o.Duraisamy aged 30, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the respondents dated 19.10.2016 against his brother branding him as a "Goonda" under the T...
Madras High Court
T.Prakasam vs Mr.Muthukrishnan
Judges:
14 March, 2017·It is represented that the order, which is the subject matter of contempt petition, has been complied with vide proceedings of the Revenue Tahsildar, Ariyalur in Na.Ka.No.AA1/3617/2015 dated 21.12.2016, which is taken on file and recorded. Therefore, the contempt petition is closed.14.03.2017 vsm In...
Madras High Court
G. Siva Kumar vs The Joint Commissioner
Judges:
14 March, 2017·By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner along with Mr.G.Senthil Kumar, filed a petition in M.P.No.106 of 2015 on the file of the respondent to declare that they are the persons next in line of succession to the post of Hereditary Trustees in Arulmigu Mariamman...
Madras High Court
Spa Enterprises vs The Chief Secretary
Judges:
14 March, 2017·Mr.C.Jagadish, learned Special Government Pleader (M.V. & M.M) takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.2. Though this writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to...
Madras High Court
L.Rasheedha vs The Secretary To ...
Judges:
14 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu H.Farooq, S/o Mr.Hameed aged 30 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 01.10.2016 against her husband branding him as a "Goonda" u...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The State Represented By
Judges:
14 March, 2017·Petitioner seeks quash of proceedings in S.C.No.173 of 2007 on the file of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram.C.T.SELVAM, J gm/sai2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate [Crl.side] for respondent.Recording the submission of learned Government Advocate [Crl.s...
Madras High Court
Rajkumar vs Roja Rani
Judges:
14 March, 2017·The main Criminal Original Petition has been filed with the following prayer: ...to call for the records in S.T.C.No.274 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Vridhachalam and quash the proceedings therein.2. Yesterday [13.03.2017] when the matter was called, there was no representa...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.