S Ganesan vs The Tahsildar
Judges: M Duraiswamy
23 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 12.04.2017 and consequently to issue separate patta to him.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of t...
Madras High Court
Govindappa vs The Assistant Settlement Officer And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
23 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2017 for rectification of defects in the revenue records with regard to erroneous classification of lands measuring about 116.04 a...
Madras High Court
The Union Of India Rep By The Secretary To Government Ministry Of Finance And Others vs Mr D Kumar And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
23 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.No.28616 of 2013 And M.P.No.1 of 20131. The Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Cen...
Madras High Court
The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police vs Mithun @ Mithunkumar And Others
Judges: V Bharathidasan
23 June, 2017·Challenging the order, discharging the respondents from the criminal case, the present revision has been filed by the State.2. All the respondents have been arrayed accused in S.C.No.186/2015 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram(Fast Track Court), Vellore District . They ...
Madras High Court
M K Chockalingam vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
23 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary action as requested in the representation of the petitioner dated 10.04.2017 to protect the running of rain water in the water way passing through the property of the petitioner.2...
Madras High Court
S Karthikeyan vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
23 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is ...
Madras High Court
Jagir Ammapalayam Wakf And Chettychavadi Wakf At Salem And Others vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
23 June, 2017·THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARANW.A. No.1634 of 20121. Jagir Ammapalayam Wakf and Chettychavadi Wakf at Salem, Rep, by its Hereditary Sardar Sajada Nasheen And Mutawalli.2. Apsar Peeran. [Name of the appellant substituted vide order of the court dated ...
Madras High Court
M Yuvaraj vs The Revenue Divisional Officer And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
23 June, 2017·The writ petition is filed seeking to quash the order of the first respondent dated 31.10.2014.R.MAHADEVAN, J.sr2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the order, which is impugned herein, has alread...
Madras High Court
Raja And Others vs R Vidyarani And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
23 June, 2017·When the matter is taken up for hearing , the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are inclined to appear before the trial R.MAHADEVAN, J.sr Court and therefore, the condition order passed by this Court dated 21.07.2016 does not survive.2. Heard the learned counsel for the...
Madras High Court
United India Insurance Company Ltd Chennai 600 006 vs 1 Ponniappan 1St
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
23 June, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR,J) Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded to the injured- claimant, M/s.United India Insurance Company Ltd, Chennai, has filed C.M.A.No.1929 of 2016.2. Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation, the injured- claimant has filed Cross Object...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.