S.Alagar vs The Government Of India
Judges:
06 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was delivered by Mr.N.AUTHINATHAN.J.,) The petitioner has come up with the writ petition to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent No.11123/Admin/HAPP dated 03.04.2017 and quash the same as illegal and direct the first and second respondents to ...
Madras High Court
K.Ayanraj vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
06 June, 2017·When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that a regular case has been registered in Crime No.614 of 2014 on 24.10.2014 for offences under Sections 447, 294(b) and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Pe...
Madras High Court
Thiru R.John Peter vs The Additional Chief Secretary/
Judges:
06 June, 2017·This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to conclude the proceedings in TDP Case No.5 of 2016 within a time frame, not exceeding four weeks.2. The petitioner has been slapped with a charge, which is given as under:-While you (Accused Officer) Thiru R.John Peter,...
Madras High Court
Muthu vs Arunachalam
Judges:
06 June, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Suit has been disposed of and the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the said submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revi...
Madras High Court
M.Subramaniam vs The Principal Secretary To ...
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The petitioner retired as Programme Officer in the Tamil Nadu Institute of Labour Studies, Chennai and as per the order dated 30.8.2013 issued by the third respondent, it could be seen that he was permitted to retire from service on reaching the age of superannuation with effect from 31.8.2013. Ther...
Madras High Court
V.Ramamurthy vs Govindammal
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the learned trial Judge dismissed the suit in O.S. No.168 of 2008 and as such, nothing survives for adjudication.2. In view of the subsequent events relating to the dismissal of the suit in O.S. No.168 of 2008 on the file of the...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.13920 Of 2017 vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 22.05.2017 in seeking permission to conduct cultural programme in Arulmigu Sri Neethimariamman Koil to be held at Kudisai Village, Anaikattu Taluk, Vellore Distr...
Madras High Court
Muthuswamy Naidu vs Ravichandran
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement indicating that the petitioner is withdrawing the civil revision petition.2. In view of the endorsement so made, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 06.06...
Madras High Court
R.Usharani vs The Director Of Social Welfare
Judges:
06 June, 2017·Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. Notice to respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with inasmuch as no order prejudicial to their interest is passed in this writ petition.2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the...
Madras High Court
R.Subramanian vs Leo Francis
Judges:
06 June, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2.For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as the complainant and accused.3.The complainant filed a private complaint for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Trichy agai...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.