Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.Subramanian vs Leo Francis

Madras High Court|06 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as the complainant and accused.
3.The complainant filed a private complaint for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Trichy against the accused on 28.11.2016 with a delay of 30 days. The delay petition was numbered as CMP No.7373/2016 on 28.11.2016 and the following order has been passed on 29.11.2016:
?Complainant side on perused of records this petition for condoning delay for 30 days only. Reason for delay is acceptable. Hence, this Court is inclined to allow this petition with condition. The petitioner/complainant shall pay cost of Rs.300/- to DLSA Trichy on or before 17.12.2016, failing which, this petition stands dismissed. Call on 17.12.2016.?
Challenging which, the accused is before this Court.
4. This petition deserves to be allowed on the short score that the learned Judicial Magistrate has passed the impugned order, even without hearing the accused, as could be seen from the above. Fundamental principles of natural justice requires that before condoning the delay, the learned Judicial Magistrate ought to have heard the accused. Therefore, if this petition is admitted and notice is ordered to the complainant, it will only further delay the case. Therefore, this petition is allowed and the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate is set aside. C.M.P.No.7373 of 2016 is hereby remanded back to the trial Court for fresh consideration on merits. No further notice need be sent to the accused by the Magistrate. The accused shall appear before the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and furnish a bond under Section 88 Cr.P.C. for Rs.5,000/- without sureties. He shall also file a counter in C.M.P.No.7373/2016 within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Magistrate shall consider the condone delay application afresh on merits.
5. In view of the above, this petition is allowed. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
To:
1.The Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Subramanian vs Leo Francis

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
06 June, 2017