K Manjula vs The State
Judges: R Mahadevan
18 January, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.01.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.952 of 2017 Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent to complete the investigation in Crime No.251 of 2016 on the file of the respondent and...
Madras High Court
K Kasi vs The Superintendent Of Semmandapatti Village Taluk Salem District 5 Ex President Semmandapatti Village Omalur Taluk Salem District ,The Ex President Semmandapatti Village Omalur Taluk Salem District
Judges: R Mahadevan
18 January, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.01.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition No.1194 of 2017 K.Kasi ... Petitioner Vs.1 The Superintendent of Police Salem Salem District.2 The Inspector of Police Omalur Police Station Omalur Taluk Sal...
Madras High Court
Pastor Thangamuthu @ John Thangamuthu ( Died ) And Others vs K K Gnaneswaran
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 07.12.2016 PRONOUNCED ON: 18.01.2017 CORAM:THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN CRP(PD)No.1525 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 20131. Pastor Thangamuthu @ John Thangamuthu (Died)2. Daisy Rathinakumari3. Bercy Chandra .T4. Jim Reeves .T5. Joe Apollos ....
Madras High Court
V Sundarambal And Others vs M Viswanatha Iyer And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,ub It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the appeal itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.2. Recording the said submission made by ...
Madras High Court
V Sundarambal vs M Viswanatha Iyer And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,ub It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.2. Recording the said submission made by t...
Madras High Court
Kariya Gowder vs Pushpa And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.ub Today, when the Civil Revision Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement ...
Madras High Court
K G Subramani vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
18 January, 2017·The prayer made in the writ petition is to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2017 and grant permission to the petitioner to conduct the cultural and adventure programe and to give police protection which is scheduled to ...
Madras High Court
M Sharada Bai vs Uttam Chand
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·No representation on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent is present. Even in the last two hearings, namely on 09.12.2016 and on 23.12.2016 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Due to continuous absence on the side of the petitioner, the cas...
Madras High Court
K V Viswanathan vs C V Prasanna And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·The case of the petitioner is that the respondents/landlords filed R.C.O.P.No.221 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. Challenging the order in I.A.No.25 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.221 of 2006, dated 27.01.2011, this revision is filed.2. The case of the revision p...
Madras High Court
Dhanalakshmi vs P Maheswari And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
18 January, 2017·This revision has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed in I.A.No.248 of 2009 in O.S.No.150 of 1999, dated 27.10.2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirupur.2. The petitioner herein is a third party to the suit in O.S.No.150 of 1999. The respondents are plaintiff...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.