Malathy Rangarajan vs Ambujam T.M
Judges:
19 January, 2017·(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard learned counsel for parties.2. We find the appeal completely misconceived as the impugned order dated 9.1.2017 only permits recording of evidence on commission of a 96 years old lady, who is the mother-in-law of the first appellant and the grand...
Madras High Court
L.Kannamurthy vs S.Suresh Kumar
Judges:
19 January, 2017·Alleging that the order dated 23.11.2015 passed by this Court earlier in Cont. P. No.253 of 2015 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on the last occasion, this Court directed the concerned Tahsildar to permit the petitio...
Madras High Court
K.Ganesan vs Tamil Nadu State Transport ...
Judges:
19 January, 2017·W.P.No.43884/2016 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the petitioner a sum of Rs.5,56,652/- towards gratuity a sum of Rs.7,890/- towards arrears of difference in D.A. payable along with monthly pen...
Madras High Court
Leena Mary Lloyd vs Lloyd Christopher Raj
Judges:
19 January, 2017·The petitioner has filed this revision petition seeking for a direction to the First Additional Family Court, Chennai to dispose of O.P.No.1232 of 2013 within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.2. It is the case of the petitioner that she was married to the first respondent on 29.01.2004. ...
Madras High Court
Sri Sakthi Transports vs M/S. Canara Bank
Judges:
19 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by M.Govindaraj,J) This writ petition has been filed praying to quash the order, dated 12/10/2015, passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, in M.A.No.52 of 2014 and consequently direct the third respondent, to dispose of Transferred Application No.539 of...
Madras High Court
Ravi @ Karuppahiyah vs Bharathi
Judges:
19 January, 2017·This revision arises against the order of learned Judicial Magistrate I, Attur, passed in C.M.P.No.2072 of 2015 in M.C.No.10 of 2012 on 18.09.2015.2. Petitioner and first respondent are husband and wife. Second respondent is their minor daughter. Respondents moved M.C.No.10 of 2012 seeking maintenan...
Madras High Court
Santhakumari vs Prithiviraj
Judges:
19 January, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 03.10.2016, passed in E.P.No.62 of 2014 in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2014, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukkottai.2. Facts of the case:-(i) The petitioner is the respondent in E.P.No.62 of 2014 and R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2014 and th...
Madras High Court
P.Rajesh vs Mr.Gautam Dey
Judges:
19 January, 2017·It is represented by both sides that the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.1144 of 2013, dated 17.2.2015 is complied with.2.Recording the above said submission, the Contempt Petition is closed.To Mr.Gautam Dey Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai.....
Madras High Court
Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga vs 3 Assistant Commissioner Of ...
Judges:
19 January, 2017·4 Venture Lighting India Limited Rep by its Managing Director Plot No. A30 ,D5 Phase II Zone B Madras Export Processing Zone Tambaram Chennai - 600 045 ... 4th Respondent in WP.No.44775/2016 4 PMI Engineering Exports Pvd. Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director B-29, Phase II Madras Export Processing Zon...
Madras High Court
T.Senkeni vs S.George
Judges:
19 January, 2017·Alleging that the order dated 31.10.2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8083 of 2013 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.2.Learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that he has given change of vakalat. Unfortunately, there is no representation on behal...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.