O.Sajitha Rahim vs M.P.Farook
Judges:
23 January, 2017·Challenging the order dated 29.12.2010 passed by the learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate in M.P.No.6060 of 2010 in CC No.4255/2010, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the complainant.2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, there is no representation for the petiti...
Madras High Court
Amalorepavam vs Rev.Sr.Arokia Mary Mother ...
Judges:
23 January, 2017·The plaintiffs are the revision petitioners.2. The revision is directed against the order refusing to reject the proof affidavit filed by the respondent/eighth defendant in I.A.No.3 of 2013.3. The brief facts of the case is as follows:(i) The revision petitioners/plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No....
Madras High Court
P.Karuppiah vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
23 January, 2017·The petitioner is 96 years old. He has knocked the door of this Court at this age, as the respondents refused to consider his request for grant of freedom fighter pension on the reason that the petitioner has not submitted jail certificate in support of his jail suffering during the freedom struggle...
Madras High Court
Sooriah Naickar vs Subbaiah
Judges:
23 January, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 02.06.2015, passed in I.A.No.614 of 2014 in O.S.No.79 of 2014, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.2. Facts of the case:-(i) The petitioners are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintif...
Madras High Court
V.Pushpalatha vs Manoharan
Judges:
23 January, 2017·The plaintiff is the revision petitioner.2. The revision petitioner/plaintiff earlier filed a suit as against the respondents/defendants seeking permanent injunction. Since the respondents did not appear before the Court below, an exparte decree was passed. On coming to know of the same, the respond...
Madras High Court
5 J.Sundaramoorthy vs 4 S.Viswanathan
Judges:
23 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The prayer in this writ petition is for forbearing the respondents from evicting the petitioners from the occupation of S.No.271/1, Kizhkodungallur Village, Vandavasi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District till the disposal of W.P.No.1294 of 2009.2...
Madras High Court
S.Jamal Mohammed vs Mr.C.Selvaraj
Judges:
23 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent since he failed to comply with the order passed in W.P(MD)No.4435 of 2016 dated 26.09.2016 by this Court.2.The learned counsel appearin...
Madras High Court
M.Rajasekaran (Deceased) vs Saraswathi
Judges:
23 January, 2017·There is no representation on behalf of the plaintiffs, the learned counsel for the defendants 1, 4, 7 to 9 are present.2. Application to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff was allowed as early as on 30.08.2016 itself. Thereafter, the plaintiff has not taken any step...
Madras High Court
Mr.T. Panneerselvam vs The Additional Director General ...
Judges:
23 January, 2017·By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Mr.K. Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.3. The petitioner, while working as Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu State Police XV Battalion at Vellore District, was placed ...
Madras High Court
B.Ravikumar vs B.Jeyanthi
Judges:
23 January, 2017·This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2014 passed in A.S.No.14 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 17.12.2013 passed by the Sub Judge, Tiruchengode, in O.S.No.76 of 2010.2. The suit in O.S.No.76 ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.