Ratna Educational Society And Another vs The State Of A P Dept Of Higher Education And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 October, 2014·Ratna Educational Society and another … Appellants And The State of A.P. Dept. of Higher Education, rep. by the Secretary and others … Respondents W.A. No.1498 of 2003 Between: Sri Sai Educational Society and another … Appellants And The State of A.P. Dept. of Higher Education, rep. by the Secretary...
High Court Of Telangana
B Radha Krishna vs Jagadishwarappa & Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
28 October, 2014·… Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1322 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and o...
High Court Of Telangana
Itc Limited vs The Tahsildar
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
28 October, 2014·3. Petitioner company filed a reply dated 27.06.2012 bringing to the notice of respondent No.1 that in the notice under Section 7 of the Act the names of the persons, who have made allegations, have not been disclosed and therefore, requested to provide necessary documents. However, Section 7 notice...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sri Balaji Sales Corporation vs The Food Safety Designated Officer
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
28 October, 2014·At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of learned Counsel for both the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1, in refusing to release the Amber Tobacco packets belonging to the petition...
High Court Of Telangana
M Prakasa Rao vs The Regional Manager
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
28 October, 2014·Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent/his officers insisting the petitioner to sell tiffins only and not any other food items i....
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Kamadhenu Outsourcing vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
28 October, 2014·2. The District Educational Officer and Ex Officio Project Coordinator, Rastriya Madyamika Shiksha Abhiyyan (RMSA), Ananthapur. 3. The District Collector and Chairman, Outsourcing Agency Selection Committee, Ananthapur. . Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying t...
High Court Of Telangana
Paladugu Amarendar Reddy vs The Mandal Parishad Development Officer
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
28 October, 2014·Paladugu Amarendar Reddy … Petitioner and The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Praja Parishad, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District & others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.27203 of 2009 ORDER: It is reported by the counsel for the petitioner that t...
High Court Of Telangana
Subhash Kumar Gupta vs The Commissioner Of Police
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 October, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITIION No. 3901 OF 2007. ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents. This Writ Petition was filed challenging the action of the respondents more particularly the second respondent in interfer...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt M Rachana And Ors vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 October, 2014·…Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITIION No. 915 OF 2008. ORDER: When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing on 20.10.2014, there was no representation for the petitioners and hence the matter was directed to be listed for today under the caption ‘For orders’. Ev...
High Court Of Telangana
P Anandha Gajapathi Raju vs Director General Of Police
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 October, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITIION No. 26606 OF 2007. ORDER: When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing on 20.10.2014, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be listed for today under the caption ‘For orders’. Even today also...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.