The
Judges: C Praveen Kumar
14 August, 2014·Both the parties are present before the Court and they are identified by their respective counsel. When examined, the informant/ second respondent stated that he has settled the matter with the accused; and is not interested in pursuing the matter. It is now stated that the daughter of the 2nd pet...
High Court Of Telangana
N Kusuma Harinath Babu Reddy vs K Prasuna And 3 Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
14 August, 2014·? Cases referred: The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2311 of 2014 Dated 14.08.2014 Between: N.Kusuma Harinath Babu Reddy …Petitioner/2nd Plaintiff And K.Prasuna and 3 others …Respondents/D1 to D3, plaintiff No.1 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Madhusudhana Redd...
High Court Of Telangana
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs T Pradeep Kumar And 3 Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
14 August, 2014·This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 01-07-2014, in IA.No.651 of 2013 in OS.No.1173 of 2013, on the file of the Court of the learned XVI Additional District Judge at Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District (for short ‘the lower Court’). Respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed the abovementioned suit...
High Court Of Telangana
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Kanyaka Parameswari Engg Ltd
Judges: M S Ramachandra Rao I, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
14 August, 2014·… Appellant And M/s. Kanyaka Parameswari Engg. LTd., Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO I.T.T.A. No. 546 of 2014 Judgment: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is direct...
High Court Of Telangana
Potturi Hanumantha Rao And Others vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: M S Ramachandra Rao, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
14 August, 2014·DATED:14.08.2014 Between: Potturi Hanumantha Rao, Chilakuripet, Guntur District and others. … Appellants And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Hyderabad and another. ….Respondents THE HON’BLE TH...
High Court Of Telangana
Boddapati Venkata Ramanamurthy vs Boddapati Lalitha
Judges: G Chandraiah
14 August, 2014·The revision petitioner is the husband and the respondent is the wife. The respondent/wife filed I.A. No.481 of 2013 in O.P. No.1105 of 2013 under Section 22 of Hindu Marriage Act seeking interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month. The Court below while allowing the said application awa...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt G Sangeetha vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
14 August, 2014·2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Smt. Veeramani, W/o. Veeresham, R/o. Bantaram (V&M), Ranga Reddy District . Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayin...
High Court Of Telangana
Pankaj Kumar Moteka vs Mamidi Diwakar
Judges: G Chandraiah
14 August, 2014·The appellant and the respondent in the present appeal are the defendant and the plaintiff and the relationship between them is tenant and owner, respectively. The plaintiff filed O.S. No.516 of 2010 for eviction of the defendant from the suit schedule property, for payment of rent at the rate of Rs...
High Court Of Telangana
Dr Pradyut Waghray vs $ Margadarshi Chit Fund Ltd
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
14 August, 2014·Dr.Pradyut Waghray, S/o Late R.N.Waghray . Appellant And: Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd., Warangal Branch and five others. . Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri K.K.Waghray Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri P.Durga Prasad The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appea...
High Court Of Telangana
Dr Pothula Annapurna Naidu/Accused vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
14 August, 2014·This Criminal Petition is filed to quash FIR in Crime No.122 of 2012 of Gandepalli Police Station, East Godavari district, for alleged offence under section 3 (1) (x) of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes [Prevention of Atrocities] Act, 1989. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The petitioner is sole accused in...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.