Ram Bilash vs Sunaina Devi And 11 Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
28 January, 2021·In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not issue to the respondents. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 10, Deoria to decide the Original Suit No. 239 of 1994 (Ram Bilash vs. Sunaina), within stipulated period. It is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rampati And Another vs Jhuru And 3 Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
28 January, 2021·In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not issue to the private-respondents. The petitioners are before this Court for a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur to decide the interim injunction application No. 6C filed by plaintiff/petitioners in Civil Suit No. 1350...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Guddi Devi vs Kusuma Devi And 6 Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
28 January, 2021·The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, with the following prayer: "i. issue an order or direction, directing the court below to decide the application for temporary injunction (being paper no.6) dated 02.07.2020 Original Sui...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anushka Dubey And Another vs State Of U.P And Another
Judges: Rajeev Misra
28 January, 2021·Learned counsel for applicants contends that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purpose of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of aforesaid contention. From perusal of mat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sharik Mansuri @ Abu Bakar vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
28 January, 2021·3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 CrPC is not convincing; it is not possible to kidnap a 25 years married lady with a child from a busy market during broad-day-light at 4.15 p.m; photographs annexed with the bail app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nadir Jung vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
28 January, 2021·2. By means of this application under Section 439 CrPC, the accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR No.0380 of 2020, under Sections 363, 366-A, 370, 376-D and 506 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act lodged at Police Station Payagpur, District Bahraich. It is alleged that the prosecutrix, aged around 16 years,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Narayan Vishwakarma vs State Of U.P And Another
Judges: Siddharth
28 January, 2021·There is allegation against the applicant that he obtained job in Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation on the basis of marksheet of Class VIII which was obtained from a school which was not recognized. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that when the applicant studied in the school,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ankit Agrahari & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Mohd Faiz Khan
28 January, 2021·It is further submitted that the trial court has committed patent and manifest illegality in issuing non-bailable warrants against the applicants while the summons earlier sent by the trial court and the bailable warrants issued by the trial court was never served on the applicants and in fact the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shah Sunil Kumar Agarwal vs Bihari Lal Sanskrit Pathshala And ...
Judges: Prakash Padia
28 January, 2021·In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondents. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter-alia with the prayer to direct the court below i.e. Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC Farrukhabad to decide the i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanu Prakash vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: Mohd Faiz Khan
28 January, 2021·Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes the prayer on the ground that the applicant has himself violated the terms of order dated 27.07.2020 and, therefore, he cannot be provided any concession. Having heard learned counsel for parties and having perused the record of Petition U/s 482/378/407...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.