Mohammad Ali vs State Of U.P. Through Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
11 February, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer that suitable direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to conduct fair and impartial investigation...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nisha Bhatnagar vs U.P. Jal Nigam Thru. M.D. Lko. & ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
11 February, 2021·Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the opposite parties has fairly submitted that the post retiral benefits to the petitioner shall be paid with expedition and on account of some financial constraints to the Corporation those benefits could not be paid well in time. Having heard learned counsel...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Naresh Verma vs U.P. Jal Nigam Thru. M.D. Lko. & ...
Judges: Irshad Ali
11 February, 2021·Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the orders dated 6.1.2021 and 29.9.2020 passed by respondent Nos.4 and 2. By the impugned order, the recovery is directed against the petitioner, who is a Class-IV employee. Learned Counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon the judgm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Singh vs U.P. Jal Nigam Thru. M.D. Lko. & ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
11 February, 2021·The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner retired from service on 31.10.2019 while serving on the post of Section Officer. As per submission of learned counsel for the petitioner no post retiral benefits have been paid to the petitioner till date, resultant thereof the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shatrohan Tripathi And Anr. ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Alok Mathur
11 February, 2021·5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. After considering the rival submissions this court finds that there is a case registered/about to be registered against ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sobh Nath vs Civil Judge ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
11 February, 2021·(2) This petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following main prayer:- "Issue a direction thereby commanding/directing the Opposite Party No.1 i.e. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sadar, District Pratapgarh, to decide the Original Suit No.1564 of 2014 (Sobh Nath Vs. Rakesh Kumar Pandey an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Jain @ Ranjeet Jain & Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secretary ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
11 February, 2021·The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Rakesh Jain @ Ranjeet Jain and Mani Gutpa, seeking quashing of the First Information Report of Case Crime No. 015 of 2021 under sections 406, 420 I.P.C., police station Chinhat, District Lucknow with a further prayer to stay the ar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramu Alias Rajesh vs State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 February, 2021·Notice on behalf of opposite party Nos.1, 2 and 3 has been accepted by the learned Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Pankaj Gupta, Advocate has accepted notice for opposite party No.22. For the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, issuance of notice to private respondent Nos.4 to 21 is dispe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Purnanshu Ojha vs S.D.M. Lalganj Pratapgarh & ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
11 February, 2021·With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is being disposed of finally. The petitioner has approached this Court praying for a direction to respondent no.3, i.e Tehsildar, Lalganj, District- Pratapgarh to decide the Case No.03380 of 2018, Computerized Case No...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Shanker Pandey vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
11 February, 2021·At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be given liberty to represent his case before the competent authority. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State no objection to the innocuous prayer made by petitioner. Without entering int...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.