Shree Chandra vs Hemlata And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
19 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not issue to the respondents. The petitioner has preferred the present petitioner inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Civil Judge (Junior Di...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Khelawan vs Civil Judge And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
19 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Pursuant to the order dated 21.01.2021 a supplementary affidavit has been filed by the counsel for the petitioner, the same is taken on record. The only prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner in the present petition to direct the court below namely Civil Judge ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Guddu Diwakar @ Sushil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Bhatia
19 February, 2021·The present application has been filed with the following prayer:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the opposite party no. 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made by opposite party no. 7 to 9 over the Gata No. 417 and 420 situated at Gram Navadiya, Pargana Pahada,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulshan Dixit @ Uttam Dixit And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Pankaj Bhatia
19 February, 2021·Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1345 of 2021 Applicant :- Gulshan Dixit @ Uttam Dixit And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Yogendra Pal Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. In terms of the order passed by...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Prasad And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Pankaj Bhatia
19 February, 2021·Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. In terms of the order passed by this Court on 22.01.2021, a report has been received from the Special Judge to the extent that compromise has been verified. Counsel for the parties admitted that compromise has been duly verified. In view of the said report and the fact that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Khisore And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
19 February, 2021·4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioners that the court below is failed to correctly apply the provisions of Land Acquisition Act. It is further argued that as per the provisions of Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, the reference should be made within six weeks from the date of declarati...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogendra Singh Chauhan vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secretary ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Rajeev Singh
19 February, 2021·Heard Shri Nishit Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Dinesh Singh Rana, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Sunder Lal, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record. The present writ petition has been filed by the petition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Mohani Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. D.M. Sultanpur ...
Judges: Jaspreet Singh
19 February, 2021·The submission is that long standing entry could not have been struck off without holding a proper inquiry. It is also submitted that the aforesaid land in question even prior to the consolidation operations was recorded in the name of Smt. Mohani Devi. During consolidation operations, neither the S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmender Singh (Minor) vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Rajiv Gupta
19 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the revisionist-applicant has submitted that the revisionist-applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Learned counsel for the revisionist-applicant has next submitted that applicant has already been declared juvenile...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Archana Chaturvedi @ Ranu vs State Of U.P. And Anothers
Judges: J J Munir
19 February, 2021·The learned principal judge, Family Court Mathura, shall submit a report within a week as to why proceedings of case No 1721/XII/2019 smt. Archana Chaturvedi @ranu vs Abhinav Chaturvedi @ Sonu, under section 125(3) Cr.P.C. are still lingering on." ?????? ?????, ??????? ??? ???? ??? ???????? ???? 125...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.