Amarjeet vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
10 February, 2021·19. "From a perusal of the above provisions it would appear that in a suit for partition, the revenue court also, like the civil court, has first to pass a preliminary decree determining and declaring the rights of the parties and their shares, if any, in the holding. Thereafter, proceedings for pre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Kumar Srivastava vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home ...
Judges: Narendra Kumar Johari
10 February, 2021·Neither any application for adjournment, nor any application for pass over has been submitted on behalf of the applicant. In view of above, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 10.2.2021 ML/-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
All U.P Stamp Vendors Association vs Union Of India And 3 Others
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Ajay Bhanot
10 February, 2021·(c) Providing suitable and adequate training for operation and the use of the system to the personnel of the department as specified from time to time by the Appointing Authority; (d) facilitating in selection of authorized collection centers for Collection of stamp duty and issuing e-stamp certific...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhupendra Singh Verma & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Narendra Kumar Johari
10 February, 2021·6. Learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 conceded with the arguments of counsel for applicants that the matter between applicants and opposite party No. 2 has amicably been settled and after compromise, both the parties are residing with each other and living their happy married life. Further par...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gurupej Singh @ Gurbhej Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Pankaj Bhatia
10 February, 2021·The counsel for the applicant argues that the proceedings are liable to be quashed. A perusal of the FIR shows that the applicant has been assigned the role of being witness in a allegedly forged sale deed. No good ground for quashing of the FIR as well as charge-sheet at this stage. The application...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudhir Rawal vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Judges: Subhash Chand
10 February, 2021·This application has been filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C with the prayer to transfer the Case No. 288 of 2020 (State Vs. Mange Ram and another) arising out of case crime no. 0030 of 2020, under Section 420, 406, 120-B I.P.C, Police Station Dhaulana, District Hapur, pending in the court of Judicial M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laxmi Kant Gupta vs Additional District Judge And 2 ...
Judges: Prakash Padia
10 February, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.2. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to Additional District Judge, Court No.21, Kanpur Nagar to decide the Execution Case No.5 of 1994 (Kanhaiya Lal and others Vs. U.P. Awas Vikas Parishad, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jamirul Islam And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Raj Beer Singh
10 February, 2021·Opposite party no. 2 was examined under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and thereafter four witnesses, namely, Sayyid, Amir, Mohammad Suhail Qureshi and Ishtiyaq Mohammad were examined under Section 202 Cr.P.C. and after that applicants have been summoned under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC. It has been argued by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babloo vs Additional Civil Judge (Junior ...
Judges: Prakash Padia
10 February, 2021·In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not issue to the private-respondents. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-II, New Court, Jaunpur to consider and decide the Original Suit No. 759 of 2006 (Manikchandra and Others ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Varun Kaushik vs Vandana
Judges: Prakash Padia
10 February, 2021·The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghaziabad to decide the Matrimonial Case No.900 of 2019 (Varun Kaushik Vs. Smt. Vandana) filed under Section 12(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act within stipulated period. In view of the order proposed to be passed,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.