Ranjeet Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to revise the result and to grant the grace marks to the petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2560 of 2021 Petitioner :- Shiv Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Kumar Dwivedi,Manu Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Sri Chandra Prakash Pal holding brief of Sri Manu Khare, learned counsel for the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Mateen vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7828 of 2021 Petitioner :- Abdul Mateen Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Omkar Dutt Malviya Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Today when the matter is taken up, it is informed by learned counsel for the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Giri Goswami vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Deputy Director of Education, 3rd Region, Bareilly to release pension of the peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish Chandra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18802 of 2021 Petitioner :- Satish Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he does not want to press this writ pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anupam vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·2- This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents no.2 to examine the OMR answer sheets of the petitioner relating to UPTGT Examination, 2016 held on 31.07.2021 and declare the result of the petitioner bearing roll number 0106054078, and consider her candidature in purs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Autar Singh Rathore vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. None present on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition prayer for quashing the order of transfer dated 19.09.2009. At the time when the writ petition was filed age of the petitioner ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Akhilesh Kumar Mishra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition challenging the order of suspension dated 03.06.2006. At the time when the writ petition was filed, age of the petitioner was about 48 years. The writ petition is of the year 2006. Therefore, there is all possibil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yashoda Nand Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition challenging the order of suspension dated 02.08.2006. At the time when the writ petition was filed, age of the petitioner was about 50 years. The writ petition is of the year 2006. Therefore, there is all possibil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aparbal Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. None present on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present petition against the order of suspension dated 26/27.04.2006, passed by respondent no.3. An interim order has been granted in favour of the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.