Tej Singh Sharma vs Paschimanchal Vidut Vitran Nigam Limited And Another
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Y.D. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Srivastava for respondents no. 1 and 2. The petitioner has been served with the provisional assessment dated 29.7.2019 regarding unauthorized use of electricity to the tune...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajeet Kumar vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no.3 and 4. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the recovery dated 20.06.2019 whereby a sum of Rs.1,92,793/- is sought to be recovered from the petitioner as electricity d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sita And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 September, 2019·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Supplementary Affidavit filed today be taken on record. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the State-respondents to gi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Param Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Gulab Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has filed this petition for quashing of recovery citation dated Nil for a sum of Rs. 14,17,588/-plus others. The Bank has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raees Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel has appeared for respondents no.1 and 2. The petitioner by means of this writ petition seeks a direction upon the respondents no.3 who is a private party to release his vehicle ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Raees vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Anshul Kumar Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. The petition is direction against the recovery citation dated 15.7.2019 for a sum of Rs. 2,22,448/-. The afor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Hafeez Khan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: J
27 September, 2019·"This writ petition has been filed seeking the following material relief and no other: "(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the case No. 761 of 2013/case No. 00237/2013/computerize case no. T2013171401000237-" Abdul Hafeez...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaimal Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra for respondent no. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the demand notice dated 1.9.2018 whereby a sum of Rs. 25,62,750.22 paise has been demanded as electricity dues. The submission o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijai Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. The challenge is to the recovery citation dated 13.09.2019 for a sum of Rs.4,00,428/- as electricity dues for unauthorized use of electricity. The argument is that the said recovery has been issued without providing any checking report and co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd Agra Kukthala Vikas Khand Achchnera vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sunita
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has given him instructions not to press the present petition. Considering the said statement, it is noticed that the petitioner society is resisting joining of respondent no. 5 who was selected as Cadre Se...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.