Smt Ashok Kumari And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Suneet Kumar
28 February, 2019·Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the age of retirement of teachers of Basic Schools is 62 years as contemplated in Rule 14 of U.P. Recognized Basic Schools, Rules, 1978 (for short, 'Rules, 1978') which was duly amended vide notification dated 25 October 2005. Reliance ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Chandra Kanti Tripathi vs District Inspector Of Schools And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 February, 2019·(2) Where any vacancy referred to in clause (1) cannot be filled by promotion, due to nonavailability of a teacher in the next lower grade in the institution, possessing the prescribed minimum qualification, it shall be filled by direct recruitment in the manner laid down in clause (3). (3) (i) The ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohitash Kumar Gupta vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Suneet Kumar
28 February, 2019·Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. Ref: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 72360 of 2016 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Application is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Laxmi Singh vs The Of U P Thru Education Secy Sec Edu And Ors
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 February, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: “a) issue a writ, orde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Kumar Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 February, 2019·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondent. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have sought following reliefs: "(i) to issue a suitable writ in the nature of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Shakuntala Dubey And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 February, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Pursuant to this Court's order dated 17.01.2019, notice was issued to petitioner to engage another counsel. Perused Office Report dated 27.02.2019. Service is deemed sufficient. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Adya Prasad Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 February, 2019·1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: “a. issue a writ, order or direction in the natu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sandeep Kumar Patel vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
28 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43875 of 2012 Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Narayan Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. For the reasons recorded in the order of date passed in Writ-A 22509 of 2012, th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambika Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
28 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8645 of 2015 Petitioner :- Ambika Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.M. Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Sri Y. K. Narayan, learned counsel holding brief of Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
R P Sharma vs U P Rajya Chini Nigam Ltd Its Chairman And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
28 February, 2019·2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the following retirement benefits to the petitioner. (i) C.P.F. - Rs. 1,47,966/- admissible up to 31.07.2003. (ii) Amount o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.