Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31832 of 2005 Petitioner :- Adya Prasad Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.N. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 11.03.2005 and 23.03.2005 passed by respondent no. 2 and 3 (contained in Annexure no. 6 and 7 to this writ petition).
b. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents they did not deduct any money from the salary of the petitioner.
c. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 that after calculating, the extra money which is already paid by the petitioner will refunded.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu