Mahi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
25 February, 2019·By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S A K Filling Station vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present petition has been filed alleging that petitioner is running a retail outlet in terms of agreement with Indian Oil Corporation Limited. The petitioner is required to establish new ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mumtaj Khan Alias Babbu Khan And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. The petitioners are seeking a direction of writ of mandamus for the removal of the encroachment made by the respondent nos. 5 and 6, who are the private respondents. From the material on the record, we find that there is already an order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saumya Shukla And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
25 February, 2019·By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Malti Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
25 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6540 of 2019 Petitioner :- Malti Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Shahanshah Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. After some length of argument, the learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B N A S Mahavidyalaya vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The petitioner-Institution is aggrieved by the non-enlistment of the petitioner as an examination center. Learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that all the students of the Institution have been allocated a center which was named as a preferential center in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Akram Ali vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Janta vs Sub Divisional Officer And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Gaon Sabha and serve a copy of the writ petition upon the learned counsel during the course of the day. The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the Case No.T- 201814360502368 (Janta Vs. Gaon Sabha) under sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mujammil vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
25 February, 2019·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. When an order under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was passed on 31.7.2018, the petitioner moved a Recall Application saying that he was not heard. However, the Recall Application was also dismissed on 12.12.2018 and, therefore, against the two orders, the peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
25 February, 2019·3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing recovery citation dated 7.1.2019 for Rs.11,57,200/- plus other charges. 4. The petitioner had taken a loan of Rs.7,00,000/- for agricultural purpose. It is admitted to the petitioner that a default has been committed by the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.