Meeta Devi & Ors. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & Ors
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
29 August, 2019·Heard Sri Bhoop Chandra Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri D.K.Pathak for caveator-opposite party no.4 as well as learned Additional Government Advocate. This petition has been filed for quashing the First Information Report in Case Crime No.0101 of 2019, under Sections 419,420,465,467,468,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dheerendra Kumar Maurya vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
29 August, 2019·"Heard Sri Tushar Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Raj Krishna, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State. This Court on 18.01.2018 after hearing the matter has observed that although petitioner has made an innocuous prayer for an ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sushila Singh @ Sushila Devi vs The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
29 August, 2019·The petitioner prays for a direction to be issued to respondent no.3 to decide Case no.T20101058060003 (Amrawati vs. Satyendra Singh) filed under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act, relating to Village Kurha, Pargana Rokha, Tehsil Salon, District Raebareli. It has been submitted by the learned couns...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sweeti Agarwal & Anr. vs Additional District Magistrate, ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
29 August, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that an appropriate direction may be issued to the court concerned for expediting the proceedings of application dated 19.04.2018, said to be preferred under Section 82 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Having regard to the innocuous nature of prayer made...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bazm Aara Khan vs U.P.P.C.L.Thru ...
Judges: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Alok Mathur
29 August, 2019·Heard Shri Mohamad Ehtesham Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 as well as Shri Shiv Shankar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 4. The writ petition has been filed to challenge the o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rambali vs Civil Judge J.D. Court No. 29 ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
29 August, 2019·In view of the proposed order, requirement of issuance of notice to the respondent no.2 is hereby dispensed with. Considering the innocuous nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to respondent no.1 to expedite the proc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghav Ram Upadhyaya vs Ravindra Singh Gangwar,Dir.Cum ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
29 August, 2019·"6. That it is most respectfully submitted before this Hon'ble Court that in pursuance of judgement and order dated 22.5.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Court, the case of the petitioners regarding promotion on Class-III post has been considered by the aforesaid selection committee under the provisions o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinita Agarwal vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
29 August, 2019·There is consensus at bar that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in a bunch of petitions, the leading petition being Writ Petition No.18904 (SS) of 2019 in re: Manju Lata vs. State of U.P. and others, decided on 13.08.2019, a copy of which is Annexure-9 to the petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gunjan Dubey [Second Bail] vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rekha Dikshit
29 August, 2019·In view of the aforesaid submissions, the application is rejected as not pressed. However, learned trial court concerned is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order befo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pushpa Devi & Anr. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & Ors
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
29 August, 2019·It has been alleged that both the petitioners are major and have married with each other out of their own volition. The age of petitioner No.1 is about 20 years as per the Aadhar Card annexed to the writ petition. There is no first information report lodged against the petitioners till date. Learned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.