Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt. Sushila Singh @ Sushila Devi vs The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 August, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Oral) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner prays for a direction to be issued to respondent no.3 to decide Case no.T20101058060003 (Amrawati vs. Satyendra Singh) filed under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act, relating to Village Kurha, Pargana Rokha, Tehsil Salon, District Raebareli.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a mutation case has been filed on the basis of Succession in 1996 wherein orders were passed on 10.6.1998 by the Naib Tehsildar. A restoration was filed by the petitioner thereafter, which has been allowed and the mutation case has been pending for the past several years.
Without entering into the merits of the controversy, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to consider and decide the pending mutation case at the earliest, say within a period of eight weeks from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before the authority concerned.
Order Date :- 29.8.2019 Sachin
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt. Sushila Singh @ Sushila Devi vs The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 August, 2019
Judges
  • Sangeeta Chandra