M/S R K S Ent Udyog vs Commissioner Trade/Commercial Tax U P Lucknow
Judges: Vivek Varma
26 April, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 476 of 2008 Applicant :- M/S R.K.S. Ent Udyog Opposite Party :- Commissioner Trade/Commercial Tax U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Rishi Raj Kapoor Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. As prayed the case is passed over for the day. L...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramraj vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
26 April, 2019·Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 913 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ramraj Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey,Shiv Ram Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Heard Sri Shiv Ram Dubey, Advoca...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rahman Khan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Sri V.K. Dubey, learned counsel for respondent 4. 2. Petitioner claims that one Santosh Kumar, not a party in this Public Interest Litigation (PIL), has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Trilochan Kaur vs State Of U P
Judges: Rajul Bhargava
26 April, 2019·Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 35 of 2018 Applicant :- Trilochan Kaur Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mr Syed Shahnawaz Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. The case is called out. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Emami Limited vs The Commissioner
Judges: Yashwant Varma
26 April, 2019·Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri B.K. Pandey, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. This revision calls in question an order of the Tribunal dated 30 March 2019 granting limited relief to the petitioner against the condition of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Maqsood Ansari vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Heard Sri Shahid Ali Siddiqui, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent 4 and Sri Rajnish Kumar Rai, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3. 2. This is a thoroughly misconceived and ill advised petition fi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Kumar Kushwaha vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Rajul Bhargava
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. The present transfer application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to transfer the Criminal Case no. 2244 of 2012 (State vs. Deepak Kumar and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 330 of 2012, u/s 498A, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravi Yadav vs Up Power Corporation Limited And Others
Judges: Yashwant Varma
26 April, 2019·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1934 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ravi Yadav Respondent :- Up Power Corporation Limited And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pranesh Kumar Mishra,Sushil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Pankaj Srivastava,Baleshwar Chaturvedi Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J. Learned counsel for p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Rajul Bhargava
26 April, 2019·Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 16 of 2018 Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Janam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. The case is called out. No one appears on behalf of the appli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarita Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Heard Sri Sheo Mani Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. Grievance of petitioner is that there is some encroachment by private respondent nos.6 to 13 on public road/public path. 3. If th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.