Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sarita Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 464 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sarita Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheo Mani Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Sheo Mani Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. Grievance of petitioner is that there is some encroachment by private respondent nos.6 to 13 on public road/public path.
3. If there is an encroachment on public road/public path by an individual, remedy lies before authority concerned under Section 25 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or approaching District Magistrate under Section 133 Cr.P.C.
4. Dismissed on ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 Vivek Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sarita Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sheo Mani Yadav