Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ramraj vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 913 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ramraj Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey,Shiv Ram Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Shiv Ram Dubey, Advocate, for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.
2. Grievance of petitioner is that there is some encroachment on the public path in rural area. If that be so, petitioner has statutory remedy under Section 25 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and when pointed out, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to avail the said remedy.
3. The writ petition is dismissed with the permission as sought for.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramraj vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Uma Nath Pandey Shiv Ram Dubey