Suresh vs Additional Agra Mandal And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 November, 2018·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Revision No. C201601001462 (Amar Singh and another vs. Suresh) under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act which is pending since 2016 is not being decided and therefore a prayer is made that the Revision No. C201601001462 be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yesh Pal Singh vs Mahendra Pal Singh & Others
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
27 November, 2018·Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 848 of 1987 Appellant :- Yesh Pal Singh Respondent :- Mahendra Pal Singh & Others Counsel for Appellant :- B.Malik Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajoddin vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
27 November, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is before this Court assailing the order impugned dated 9.10.2018 passed by the fourth respondent whereby the licence of the fair price shop of the petitioner has been suspended. Learned counsel for the petitioner apprised to the Court that earlie...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Guruji Electronics And Electricals vs The Of U P And Others
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 November, 2018·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is an ex-parte order passed without service of any notice on the petitioner. Further, it is stated that the petitioner is engaged in a petty trade of electronics repair and he does not hav...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangal Prajapati vs Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Awadh University And Others
Judges: Ashok Kumar
27 November, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38734 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mangal Prajapati Respondent :- Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Awadh University And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,Hari Om Shukla Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Adarsh Rice Mill And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
27 November, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The petitioners are aggrieved by the recovery certificate date 26.10.2018 whereby a sum of Rs.16,11,336/- plus expanses are being...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Munesh And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
27 November, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Dkshina And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
27 November, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Vivek Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Janki Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 November, 2018·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The sole prayer of the writ petitioner is that the Partition Suit No.T20160544021827 (Smt. Janki Devi vs. Komal and others) under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 be decided within a stipulated period of time. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shareef vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 November, 2018·2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being finally disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit. 3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing impugned recovery certificate dated 24.04.2018 for Rs. 05,09,651/-. 4....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.