Brahmanand Pathak vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Upadhyay for the petitioner, Sri Arvind Kumar Goswami, for respondent-1 and Sri B.K. S. Raghuvanshi for respodnents-2 to 4. The writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing Chief General Manager (responent-2) to consider the claim of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manish Kumar Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 March, 2018·The petitioners are before this Court for a direction to District Inspector of Schools concerned to consider his representation for grant of financial approval to his appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers in the institution in question and to pass appropriate order in respect of payment of s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudhindra Kumar Tiwari vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Vivek Kumar Birla
28 March, 2018·Petitioner :- Sudhindra Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Pratap Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brij Raj Singh,Santosh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Re-Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 15232 of 2018 Allowed. Re-Writ Petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anurag Dubey vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondent. Petitioner is before this Court with the request to command the District Inspector of Schools, Jaunpur to grant approval to the selection and appointment o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Krishna Jha vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8752 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Krishna Jha Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Petitioner is a pensioner. His grievance is that pension paid to him is inadequate, and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Afsar Ali vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8754 of 2018 Petitioner :- Afsar Ali Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mirza Faheem Beg Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Petitioner has been transferred from Police Station Ghoorpur in Allahabad to Mahoba, pursuant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramsumer Thakur vs Additional Commissioner Azamgarh And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
28 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11130 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ramsumer Thakur Respondent :- Additional Commissioner Azamgarh And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. The petitioner filed a suit under Section 229-B of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dashwant vs Sub Divisional Magistrate Azamgarh And Another
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Sitaram Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel. This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.1 . Sub- Divisiona Magistrate, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Azamgarh to dec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sewak vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
28 March, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel. This writ petition is preferred against the orders dated 12.7.2017 and 27.1.2018 ejecting the petitioner under Section 122-B of the UPZA&LR Act. Learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jasvinder Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
28 March, 2018·Heard Sri Parvesh Kumar Pandey, counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Ms. Pooja Talwar, counsel for the respondent-bank. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from the petitioner. Admittedly, the petitioner too...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.