Yogendra Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
29 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for State. The writ petition has been filed against the notice issued by City Magistrate dated 5.2.2018 seeking upon the petitioner to move a fresh application according to Arms Rules, 2016. Since Rule 25 of Arms...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
29 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to decide the restoration application dated 13.9.2017 filed by the petitioner in Case No.219 (Raj Kumar vs. Raja Ram), under Sections 34/35 of the U.P. Land ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sorman Shukla vs State Of U P
Judges: Rajesh Dayal Khare
29 March, 2018·Counsel for Appellant :- Pradeep Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- D G A Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Sri Pradeep Chandra, learned counsel for the appellant has sent his illness slip. Record of the present case also reflects that the trial Court record has not yet been summon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prakash Veu Singh vs State Of U P
Judges: Rajesh
29 March, 2018·Respondent :- State Of U.P. Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. List revised. None appears for the appellant even in revised reading of the list. Pursuant to the earlier order of this Court dated 07.02.2018 record of the lower Court was summoned as well as status report with regard ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Muskan Balmik And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
29 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Jasmin Khatun And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
29 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Narayan Alias Maley vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
29 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to decide Case No.T20140203042004 of 2014 (Raj Narayan vs. State of U.P), within a stipulated period. Learned standing counsel submits that no useful...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sreya Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
29 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Kant Tripathi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
29 March, 2018·Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents. The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking a direction to the respondents to pay him interest at market rate on the amount of Rs.22,54,3...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Chandra Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
29 March, 2018·According to the petitioner he had earlier filed Writ Petition (C) No.44491 of 2017 (Lal Chandra Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and Others) in which an order was passed on 20.09.2017. Upon which it appears that action was also taken and the Plot No.413, area 0.081 hectare was cleared of encroachment. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.