Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11497 of 2018 Petitioner :- Surendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Bans Singh,Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.
It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to decide the restoration application dated 13.9.2017 filed by the petitioner in Case No.219 (Raj Kumar vs. Raja Ram), under Sections 34/35 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, as well as the parent proceedings, within a stipulated period.
Learned standing counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the respondent concerned.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent concerned to decide the aforesaid restoration application, preferably on the next date fixed, as well as the parent proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 4 months from the date of the production of the certified copy of the order. It is made clear that the respondent concerned would not grant unnecessary adjournments, adjournments if any, shall be for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract cost of Rs.250/-, to be paid to the other side.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes not to seek any frivolous adjournment before the respondent concerned.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Service of the certified copy of the order upon the respondent concerned shall constitute sufficient notice to submit a compliance report.
List on 22.10.2018 in Chambers at 4.00 PM along with a compliance report.
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 Chandra