Rekha Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The prayer made in the present writ petition is to issue a direction to the respondents to make a proper enquiry and put the petitioner in possession of land which was included in the holding of the petitioner. It is admitted to t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramkesh Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
30 March, 2018·The order impugned in the present petition is an order passed by the Collector/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Azamgarh under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 on the report submitted by the Consolidation Officer dated 25.11.2017. The said report records that as per the ol...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajaram vs Board Of
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav and Sri Rahul Kumar Tyagi, learned counsels for the respondents. The present writ petition is directed against the remittal order dated 8.11.2017 passed by the Board of Revenue, U.P. It appears that the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Kumar vs Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd And Others
Judges: Krishna Murari
30 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.S. Yadav holding brief of Shri K.D.S. Rathore, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the demand notice dated 24.11.2017 of Rs.53,37,347/- ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Astha Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 March, 2018·It is stated that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have got married with each other and their marriage has also been registered on 20.3.2018. However, it is stated that the respondents are not allowing them to stay together. Learned counsel by looking into the papers of the parties certifies that they ar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Laiba Ansari @ Kannu And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 March, 2018·By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that their marriage was solemnized on 17.10.2014. Learned counsel has submitted that to begin with the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Premlata And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lakhani And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dilip Gupta
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. The case of the petitioners is that their land was acquired for the purpose of construction of a dam and they are entitled to compensation in terms of a Government Order dated 25 October 2014, which has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhaumdatt vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Krishna Murari
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krishna Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 2 & 3. Grievance of the petitioner is that despite having completed all necessary formalities for getting electricity connection to r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yashoda Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Krishna Murari
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents no. 2 to 3 to remove the illegal encroachment made by the respondents no. 4 to 6 over the petitioner's land. Dispute is between...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.