Manorama Rai vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9123 of 2018 Petitioner :- Manorama Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In pith and substance, the petitioner is as...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ankur Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to District Inspector of Schools concerned to consider his representation for grant of financial approval to his appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in the institution in question and to pass appropriate order in respect of payment of sala...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishan Dutt Sharma And Ors vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Goswami,Anil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Shri Rajesh Yadav, Advocate a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Neetu Rani And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11689 of 2018 Petitioner :- Smt. Neetu Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Perdeep Kumar Vishnoi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. It has come to light that a First Information Report has been lodged ag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jeet Narayan Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh for the petitioner and Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh for respondents-2 to 5. This writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondents to grant 1st, 2nd and 3rd benefits of Assured Career Progression Scheme to the petitioner. It h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Manju Kardam And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 March, 2018·It is stated that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have got married with each other and their marriage has also been registered on 21.2.2018. However, it is stated that the respondents are not allowing them to stay together. Learned counsel by looking into the papers of the parties certifies that they ar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Chanchal Kumari And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baburam And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Ashwani Kumar
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Petitioners were appointed as Field Worker in the office of Nagar Maleriya Officer, Moradabad on different dates in 1982 and 1994. They are seeking promotion to the post of Superior Field Worker. It is contended that in terms of the applicable service rules, the eligi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subash Chandra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.1 and 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not go to respondent nos.3 and 4. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 20.03.2018 passed by Di...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing the Executive Engineer (respondent-3) to decide the representation of the petitioner, relating to payment of his post retiral dues, including pension. It has been stat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.