Srikant vs State Of U P Throguh Principal Secretary Panchayt Raj And Othres
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Heard Shri Kripa Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4. The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to remove the names of the respondents no. 5 to 9 from the House no. 46 of the Fa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandrika vs State Of U P Collector Ballia And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to conclude the proceedings of Case No.45/2007 (Chandrika & Others vs. Ram Shankar & others), under Section 229-B of the U.P....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashish Kumar Maurya vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
27 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7749 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Maurya,Yadvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nivriti Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Singh Kushwaha vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Subedar Mishra for the petitioner and Sri D.S. Chauhan for respondents-3 and 4. The counsel for the respondents pointed out that the petitioner has challenged the order dated 2.6.2015 and 27.7.2016 in revision before State Government under Section 41 of U...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Imrati And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7744 of 2018 Petitioner :- Imrati And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bharat Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Geeta Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
27 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to conclude the proceedings of Revision No. 286D of 1999 (Ramdev vs. Geeta Devi and others), pending since 26.6.1999, within a stipulated period. Learned st...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Deep Agarwal vs State Of U P & Another
Judges: Amar Singh Chauhan
27 February, 2018·. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12347 of 2006 Applicant :- Shiv Deep Agarwal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- B.P. Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Amar Singh Chauhan,J. It is submitted by learned counsel for t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Committee Of Management Sri Jaidev Singh Memorial Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidhyalay vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Manoj Misra
27 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7731 of 2018 Petitioner :- M/S Committee Of Management Sri Jaidev Singh Memorial Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidhyalay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. The prayer in this pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pavan Jauhari vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 12.12.2017 passed in application No. 116 of 2016 (Pavan Juahari Vs. Dipika and others), under Section 12...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.