Kalpeshkumar vs Sonalben
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Respondent No.1 is served, but, not present.Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent No.2 - State.In the facts of the case, this application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute.(Z.K.SAIYED, J.) sas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Rc Kodekar Addl.Public ...
Judges:
11 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The police has produced the corpus as well as respondent No.2 before us.We have talked to the corpus. She states that she is in love with respondent No.2 and it was at her insistence respondent No.2 joined her when she left the house of her parents. She states ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amarben vs Unknown
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application same is allowed in terms of paragraph No. 6(A) and 6(B). Main matter to be restored to its original file. This application stands disposed of accordingly.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nimeshbhai vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·RULE.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L.B. Dabhi waives service of notice of Rule for the respondent - State.This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.58/2011 with Palsana Police Station, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shivam vs Rajuben
Judges:
11 May, 2012·To be placed along with First Appeals No. 4571 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 4572 of 2006 to First Appeal No. 4584 of 2006 on 15.06.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ratnabhai vs Jagdishbhai
Judges:
11 May, 2012·1. This application has been preferred by the legal heir of the original petitioner, who is already on the record of the petition, with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the petition being Special Civil Application No.6736/2008.2. Heard Mr.Sanjay Joshi, learned advocate for Mr.P.R.Thakkar, learned ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pashchim vs Amitbhai
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Notice for final disposal returnable on 20.06.2012.Ms.Bhaya, learned advocate for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of Apex Court in case of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Anis Ahmad and decision of the Division Bench in case of Manoramaben Kansara wd/o. Balkrishna Kansara Vs. Madh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vihal vs State
Judges:
11 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned counsel Shri Apurva Kapadia appearing for the applicant does not press this Application as the same has become infructuous.Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.{Akil Kureshi, J.} {Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.} Prakash* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhukar vs Pritiben
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Considered the submissions advanced by Mr.Rachh, learned advocate for the applicant. Vide order dated 2.3.2012, this Court directed that the three Criminal Misc.Applications referred in paragraph 5, which were pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Rajkot shall be transferred to the Court of learned ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Umar vs Learned
Judges:
11 May, 2012·Learned senior counsel, Mr. S.M.Shah submitted that the respondents have expressed, through their advocate, no objection to the application being allowed. Accordingly, this application is allowed and Special Civil Application No. 26010 of 2006 is restored to the file. It may be listed for hearing be...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.