Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Kalpeshkumar vs Sonalben

High Court Of Gujarat|11 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Respondent No.1 is served, but, not present.
Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent No.2 - State.
In the facts of the case, this application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute.
(Z.K.SAIYED, J.) sas Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kalpeshkumar vs Sonalben

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
11 May, 2012

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.