Multi vs Kwality
Judges:
09 May, 2012·Notice for final disposal to the respondents returnable on 26 th June, 2012.Ad-interim relief in terms of Para No.5(C) is granted on a condition that the appellants shall deposit an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- before the trial court.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dashrath vs State
Judges:
09 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Learned APP, Mr.Pandya, waives service of Rule on behalf of the State.Present applicant is already enlarged on temporary bail by order passed by this Court on 1.5.2010 recorded in Criminal Misc. Application No.5892 of 2012. Pursuant to the said orde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vaishnav vs High
Judges:
09 May, 2012·1. The two petitioners have taken out present petition seeking below mentioned relief, declaration and directions:"38(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, to quash and set aside Rule 8(3) of the Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005 (as amended in 2011) that requires minimum qualif...
High Court Of Gujarat
Koli vs Koli
Judges:
09 May, 2012·Ms.Mamta Vyas, learned advocate for the applicants seek permission to withdraw both the application as heirs and legal representatives of original appellant nos. 2 and 4 propose to submit appropriate application for condonation of delay as well as permitting them to be brought on record as heirs and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lark vs State
Judges:
09 May, 2012·In the order dated 2.5.2012 passed in present petition, in para 5.2, through inadvertence, it is written as "maximum", however, it should be "minimum". Hence, the said line of para 5.2 be corrected and read as "For the purpose of this scheme, the minimum working capital".It is also noticed that, in ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Naroda
Judges:
09 May, 2012·This Civil Application is taken out by applicant - original respondent No. 2 in main Special Civil Application with following prayers:"(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to vacate ex-parte order dated 11/4/2012 in captioned Special Civil application as the same stays the comprehensive notice passed by th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs Present
Judges:
09 May, 2012·1.0. Present Civil Revision Application has been preferred by the applicant herein-original opponent to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 11.2.2002 passed by the learned Small Cause Court No.7, Ahmedabad passed in P. S. R. P No. 8 of 1995, by which the learned Small Cause Cou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayanti vs State
Judges:
09 May, 2012·Mr.S.V. Raju, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the impugned FIR is based on the order dated 7.12.2011 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, by which, a report was called for from the Commissioner of Police, Surat, and the power also came to be exercis...
High Court Of Gujarat
Axis vs Unknown
Judges:
09 May, 2012·Upon the Application of the Applicant Company above named by Company Application and upon hearing Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior counsel for the Applicant Company and upon reading the Affidavit of Mr.Pradeep Jyotindra Oza, the Company Secretary of the Applicant Company, affirmed on 4th May, 2012,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajubhai vs Deputy
Judges:
09 May, 2012·Mr.Motiramani, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to move the Vacation Court in case of difficulty. Permission as sought for is granted, only after taking prior permission from the Vacation Court. The rejoinder be taken on record.[ S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ] /vgn Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.