Maheshchandra vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage.Permission as prayed for is granted.In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn.SD/-(Anant S. Dave, J.) Caroline Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4f4d6c6ccc5e4f4d6c5cfc5d7cc">[email protected]</a> vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·Learned APP to place on record the medical report about the ailments of the applicant. Stand over to 19/06/2012.(Anant S. Dave, J.) cmj/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jeeshan vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application at this stage since the charge-sheet is not filed.Permission granted as prayed for. The matter is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) PIYUSH Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrabhai vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·Leave to join the concerned Department.RULE returnable on 1st June, 2012. Learned APP Mr. K.P. Raval waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent - State. Direct Service to newly joined respondent.Sd/-(Anant S. Dave, J.) Caroline Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohammad vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission granted as prayed for. This application stands disposed of as withdrawn.( Anant S Dave, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation vs Tusharbhai Navinchandra
Judges:
31 May, 2012·1. Present application, under section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the applicant Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation for Leave to Appeal against the impugned judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.5.2012 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Ci...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hariram vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·1. This application is preferred by the accused-applicant for the offences registered under sections 406, 420, 506 (2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code against the applicant vide C.R. No.I-193 of 2012 with Naranpura Police Station, Ahmedabad on the ground that the applicant is falsely implicated and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharvad vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·1. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I- 12 of 2012 with Mandal Police Station, District: Ahmedabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 332, 337, 338,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tapan vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·1. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I-98 of 2012 with Rajkot "A" Division Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 364(C) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Learned counsel...
High Court Of Gujarat
Atmaram vs State
Judges:
31 May, 2012·In view of the information received by learned advocate for the applicant that subsequently the applicant was arrested after filing of the application, prayer of anticipatory bail becomes infructuous, keeping it open for the applicant to pursue the remedy in accordance with law at the earliest.Accor...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.