Harishkumar vs Jayshreeben
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Time to pay process fees is extended upto 11th April 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J.) mary// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs After Hearing Mr
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue NOTICE, returnable on April 11, 2012.After hearing Mr. Joshi, the learned senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and after going through the materials on record, we are convinced that the appellant has made out ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs After Hearing The
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue NOTICE, returnable on April 11, 2012.After hearing the learned advocates for the respective applicants and after going through the materials on record, we are convinced that the appellants have made out a strong prima facie ca...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahummad vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·From the report dated 27.3.2012 of the Medical Officer, Vadodara Central Jail, Vadodara, it is evident that the applicant was referred to S.S.G. Hospital, Vadodara, but all the senior consultants were on strike and, hence, the needful could not be done. That, the patient's ailment and disease are li...
High Court Of Gujarat
Civil Application No. 5824 Of 2 vs Unknown
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D.S.SINHA) On the request of Mr. N. L.Patel, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, the application is directed to come up after the ensuing summer vacation.(D. S.Sinha, C.J.) (B.C.Patel, J.) parekh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr M.S. Shah For
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI) 1.This Appeal is taken up today for final disposal on the joint request made by the learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company Mr. P.V. Nanavati and learned Counsel Mr. Mehul S. Shah, for the claimants respondents No.1 and 2.2.Heard. Vide order dated 27.7.2001 t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Misc.Application No. 6 ... vs Public Prosecutor For
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Having heard Ld.counsel for the parties, and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case the applicant-accused is directed to present himself before the I.O. on 8-4-2002 between 10-00 a.m. to 5-00 p.m. for the purpose of interrogation. If the interrogation is not completed on that day, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shafiq vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Notice returnable on 2.4.2012.Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and 2.Direct service to respondent Nos. 3 and 4.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Ms Pj Davawala For
Judges:
28 March, 2012·In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought certain reliefs against the Cantonment Board (respondent No. 1) and its officer (respondent No. 2) regarding supply of water to the premises in the petitioner's occupation.2.The petitioner claims to be a tenant of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parmar vs Abdul
Judges:
28 March, 2012·1. Leave to amend.2. RULE.Shri Mansoori, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no. 2.3. The present application has been preferred by the applicants-heirs and legal representatives of the original appellant permitting them to be brought on record as appellants nos...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.