Gautam vs Madanlal
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. The present Second Appeal u/s.100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant herein- original plaintiff to quash and set aside the judgement and decree dated 14/10/2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Navsari in Regular Civil Appeal No.52 of 2006, by which, le...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Sardarbhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) RULE returnable on 26.04.2012. On the condition that the applicants deposit before the Trial Court, 50% of the amount awarded by the impugned award alongwith proportionate cost and interest on or before the returnable date, there shall be stay against execu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amitkumar vs Charutar
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) The cause of the aforesaid two writ petitions are different and therefore they are segregated from the group of matters and shall be listed separately for hearing. Registry is directed to list the aforesaid two writ petitions on 17.4.2012.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (A....
High Court Of Gujarat
Iqbalsha vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.The petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- within two weeks from today with the trial court and, thereafter, continues to pay Rs.3,000/- every month starting from 1st April 2012 to respondent No.2-wife till she appears before this Court and is hear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Royal vs Dahiben
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 15.04.2006 in which Dineshbhai expired, the heirs and legal representatives of deceased preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.157/2006 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, [FTC-5] Nadiad. T...
High Court Of Gujarat
5 vs Notice Served By Ds For Respondent ...
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the materials on record, we find that the respondent No.12 has already filed an application under section 65.B of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1979 before th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anjanaben vs Marie
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1 By way of this application the applicant - original respondent no.1 has prayed for the following reliefs :"(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to allow this Civil Application;(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to vacate the interim relief granted by this Hon'ble Court vide order dtd. 23.08.2011 in Sp...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohmmad vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Keeping in mind that the applicant is in jail, trial is directed to be completed within nine months. If trial is not over nine months, applicant is at liberty to file afresh which when filed will be decided on merits, in accordance with law and without being influenced by this order of withdrawal.In...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanesara vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Heard Mr. Rao, learned Advocate for petitioner.Notice returnable on 2nd April 2012. Direct service today.It would be open to the petitioner to request the respondent society to take note of the fact that the Court has taken cognizance of the petition and any action which may cause loss to the person...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abbasha vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Present Second Appeal is of the year 2005 and still pending for admission hearing. This Second Appeal is already adjourned for 46 times and mainly due to non-availability of the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant.Today also, when the present Second Appeal is called out twice, on b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.