Deceased vs Appearance
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. CB Patel for the appellant. Admit. Bailable warrant in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- be issued against the respondent accused.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J) *asma Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohammadkhan vs Appearance
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Mr.Jain, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to delete respondent No.1.Permission as prayed for is granted. The respondent No.1 stands deleted. Registry is directed to carry out the amendment accordingly.It appears that the registry has wrongly raised the objection that cogn...
High Court Of Gujarat
Navprakash vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Mr.Mrugen K.Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the appellant prays for and and is allowed to delete respondent nos. 4 and 7 from the array of respondents in Letters Patent Appeal. He may do so during the course of the day. List on 13.4.2012.(V.M.SAHAI,J)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indra vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned AGP Ms.Jirga Jhaveri prays for and is allowed three weeks' time to file affidavit-in-reply. In the reply it shall be clearly stated that after 30 years why the appellant society cannot be permitted to transfer the land, and why the land of the appell...
High Court Of Gujarat
Unknown vs State Of Gujarat & 3
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Heard learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner. Rule.Mr. J.K.Shah, learned APP waives service of notice for respondent - State of Gujarat.Ad-interim in terms of para 7[B] till further order.[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Rangliabhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 30.12.2006, present respondent No.1 and 2 preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.169/2007 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Narmada at Rajpipla, District- Narmada. The said claim pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mr Paresh Upadhyay For
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Learned advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Paresh Upadhyay places on record a communication addressed by Nazir of City Civil Court, Ahmedabad to the Registrar of City Civil Court on 29.1.2002 denoting that petitioner No.1 is suffering from paralysis and not doing any activities while petitioner No.2 w...
High Court Of Gujarat
James vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. C.M. Shah for the respondent- State.Office is directed to call for the Progress Report of C.R. No.55/2007 and C.R. No.277/2006 for the offences punishable under Sections 388 and 488 of the Indian Penal Code from the concerned Court at Baroda, which shou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhuben vs The
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicants-original defendants nos. 3 to 8 to quash and set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anand dated 13/05/2011 below Exh. 35 in Specia...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dilubhai vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·The applicant has preferred this application for grant of parole for a period of 60 days on the ground of finding a suitable alliance for his younger brother.The application is rejected by the competent authority on the ground that on an earlier occasion, the applicant had not surrendered in time an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.