Oriental vs Virji
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Amendment granted. To be carried out forthwith.Admit qua wrong assessment of income by the Tribunal at Rs. 2000/- per month instead of Rs. 1500/- and qua the joint and several liability of insurance company instead of 15%.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION1. Rule returnable on 09.04.2012.2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sipoy vs Thakor
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1.00. Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner - original complainant for the following main reliefs in para 6 :-"(A). To admit this petition.(B). To issue a writ of mandamus or any type of writ or direction against the respondent to protec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nanalal vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the appeal preferred on 24.07.2006 has yet not been disposed of, though the hearing is concluded in the year 2011 itself.In view of this, the court is of the considered view that without going into the merits, it would be most appropriate to dis...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Rajeshbhai
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue as interim relief pending final disposal of the captioned First Appeals.2. Out of the total amount deposited by the applicant, the Tribunal shall invest 70% (seventy) amount in FDR with any nationalized Bank, in the name of 'Nazir' of the Tribunal, in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sajidbhai vs District
Judges:
12 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. Applicant, complaining of non-compliance with the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in his order dated 29.08.2011 passed in Special Criminal Application No. 2186 of 2011, has filed this contempt petition.2. The applicant had approached the lea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madanlal vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by the order dated 24.11.2011 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, and he has been declared as bootlegger.Heard learned advocat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehsana vs Nathibai
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. Strong exception has been taken and grievance has been raised by learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner against the language used by the respondent in its reply affidavit dated 12/03/2012 filed in Special Civil Application No.971 of 2012.2.The averments made in para-5 of the said rep...
High Court Of Gujarat
Motilal vs Vimlaben
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Heard Mr.C.R.Abhichandani, learned advocate for the applicants, Mr.Dipen Desai, learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant and Mr.K.P.Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.2-State, so also considering the order dated 04.08.2009, passed by the learned Me...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manji vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·The relief prayed for in present application is similar to the relief prayed for in Civil Application No.10310 of 2011. Hence, in view of order passed today in Civil Application No.10310 of 2011, present civil application does not survive. The application stands disposed of accordingly.(K.M.THAKER, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.