1.00. Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner - original complainant for the following main reliefs in para 6 :-
"(A). To admit this petition.
(B). To issue a writ of mandamus or any type of writ or direction against the respondent to protect the petitioner's prayer.
(C). To call for the R & P of Criminal Case No. FIR No.391/2005 of Kadi Police Station from the JMFC Court, Kadi.
(D). To protect the petitioner and his daughter Nilamben from the tyraney of accused and other respondents.
(E). To take immediate action against the investigating officer for making delay in investigation, arresting the acused and production of Muddamal from the accused.
(F). To take action against the registrar, Marriage Registration Office, Mehsana of respondent No.1 and 12 for invalid and void Marriage Registration illegally.
(G). To take action aginst the Notary fo rhis carelessness in this matter.
(H). To take action against the Addl. Govt. G.P. For not taking objection against the forged documents, S.L.C. & Affidavit.
(I). To direct the Sp. Officer of Child Marriage restraint Act, against all parties concerned for their misdeeds."
2.00. Initially Mr.Muktesh V. Patel, learned advocate was appearing on behalf of the petitioner, however, as during the pendency of the present petition, he expired, notice was issued upon the petitioner informing the petitioner that as his advocate has expired, he is required to make an alternative arrangement and pursuant to the said notice, the petitioner named Sipoy Babubhai Amirbhai Khokhar is personally present in the Court.
3.00. Mr.Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State as well as the concerned investigating officer has stated at the bar under the instructions from the concerned investigating officer that as such the allegations made by the petitioner against the accused persons were investigated by the investigating officer and thereafter 5 accused persons have been chargesheeted for the offences punishable under sections 380, 465, 466, 471 and 114 of Indian Penal Code and Criminal Case No.93 of 2007 is pending against the accused persons in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Kadi.
4.00. In view of the above, the petitioner, who has appeared as Party-in-person, has requested to dispose of the present petition as he does not wish to proceed further with the present petition.
5.00. In view of the above, more particularly in view of the subsequent development and statement made by the petitioner - Party-in-person, present petition is disposed of as the concerned accused persons are already chargesheeted and they are facing trial. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
[M.R.
SHAH, J.] rafik Top