Kikabhai vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicants does not press this application at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw.Permission granted as prayed for. Matter stands disposed of as withdrawn.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sayakkanwar vs Revashankar
Judges:
22 March, 2012·In spite of the earlier order dated 13.02.2012, no action is taken to serve the unserved respondents. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for default.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat Mazdoor Sena - Through ... vs Vadodara Municipal Corporation & ...
Judges:
22 March, 2012·In view of the relief prayed for and the grievance made by the petitioner union, particularly with reference to Annexure-D page- 15, the petition appears to be in nature of Public Interest Litigation.The registry is directed to take necessary action of placing the matter before the Hon'ble the Actin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sursinh vs Unknown
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Learned advocate Mrs. Shilpa Shah under the instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.(Z.K.SAIYED,J.) ynvyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arihant vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Heard Mr.V.C.Vaghela, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that the stay application filed the petitioner has been rejected by rendering findings that would almost render the revision application preferred by the petitioner, infructuous. It is further submitted that if interim...
High Court Of Gujarat
Unknown vs State Of Gujarat & 8
Judges:
22 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue notice returnable on April 19, 2012. Since Mr Jani, the learned Government Pleader has instruction to appear on behalf of the State-respondents, he waives service of notice on behalf of the State-respondents. Hence, notice nee...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manharlal vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Rule. Mr. KP Raval, Ld. APP, Mr. Mehul Sharad Shah, Ld. Advocate and Mr. Umesh Trivedi, Ld. Advocate waive service of rule for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively.2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned advocates representing the parties, the matter...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanabhai vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicant and it is submitted that 'wil' executed in 1958 as well as in 2006 referred to in complaint are subject matter of the civil suit pending in the Civil Court.In view of the above, Notice returnable on 9.4.2012.Meanwhile no coercive action be taken against the a...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Babubhai
Judges:
22 March, 2012·RULE returnable on 9th March 2012. Direct service is permitted.(M.R.Shah, J.) menon Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Samjibhai vs Swatiben
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Both the advocates state that there is a chance of settlement between the parties, therefore, matter may be sent to Mediation Center.In view of the above, office is directed to place the matter before the Mediation Center.(Z.K.SAIYED,J.) ynvyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.