State Of Gujarat vs Oral Order
Judges:
26 March, 2012·The learned Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra in his well reasoned judgment, after appreciating the evidence on record, acquitted both the respondents for the offence punishable under Section 302, 120(B) in the alternative under Section 34 of the IPC, which is challenged in the present Appeal by...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr.J.R. Nanavati With Mr Pv Hathi ...
Judges:
26 March, 2012·: (Per M.R. Calla, J.) Rule. Shri J.R. Nanavati and Shri P.V. Hathi, waive service of the rule.2.This Civil Application has been filed in Letters Patent Appeal seeking condonation of delay of 292 days in filing the Appeal.3.Special Civil Application No.4015 of 1990 out of which this matter arises wa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Dc Dave For
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1.The Registry is directed to examine the original record of the appeal, as also the Civil Applications and to ascertain the correct names of the advocates, (1) who appear for the original appellant in the first appeal, and whether Mr. N.C.Thakkar or Mr.N.K.Thakkar has filed appearance for any of th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Aj Patel For
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per: J.M. Panchal, J.) By means of filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the Land Acquisition Officer as well as Government of Gujarat to permit him to make representation in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Umar vs Mohmed
Judges:
26 March, 2012·None present for the petitioner. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for default. Rule is discharged and interim relief, if any is operating, is vacated. No order as to costs.(D.H. WAGHELA, J.) Umesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Unus
Judges:
26 March, 2012·None present for the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. Interim relief is vacated with no order as to costs.(D.H. WAGHELA, J.) Umesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashish vs Official
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1. By an order dated 28.2.2012, this Court (Coram: K.M. Thaker, J.) had passed the following order:-"Mr.R.M.Desai, learned advocate for OL, has submitted that already a note has been filed to place the record of Company Application No.473/2008 alongwith present application, however, the said record ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhikhabhai vs Gsrtc
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1. The appellant herein has challenged the award dated 04.12.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Valsad in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 372 of 2002 (Old No. 96 of 1993) so far as the Tribunal awarded only Rs. 2,00,000/-as compensation with interest and costs.2. It is the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jashubhai vs State
Judges:
26 March, 2012·Notice for final disposal, returnable on 10.04.2012.As the notice for final disposal is issued on the submission that all the requisite formalities for executing the deed was completed including the payment of stamp fee charges, as could be seen from the challan produced on record. The notice came t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parshotambhai vs Appearance
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned A.G.P. Ms. Moxa Thgakkar tendered affidavit of respondent No.2 dated 23rd March,2012. She submitted that even before the present Contempt Petition was filed, the authorities had taken decision as desired by this Court in the order dated 23rd March, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.