Idea vs Rajkot
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1. Mr.Amit M. Panchal, learned advocate for the petitioner prays for permission to annex the complete document at Annexure-G, as the document annexed at Annexure-G is incomplete. Further, it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to annex judgment dated 07.03.2012 in Letters Patent Appeal No...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhavabhai vs State
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the applicants. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application for bringing heirs on record of the deceased respondent No. 3 as his legal heirs is required to be allowed. The application is accord...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Sp Dave
Judges:
26 March, 2012·Rule. Learned APP Mr. S.P. Dave waives service of rule.Convict - Ganpatbhai Ashabhai Patanvadiya, undergoing lifer since 24.12.1996, has applied for temporary bail for house repair. He has produced the certificate issued by Sarpanch of the Kaliyari Gram Panchayat, dated 16.6.2000 to substantiate his...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehsana vs Niteshkumar
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. Heard learned counsel Mr.Saurabh M.Patel for the petitioner and learned counsel Mr.Chetan Pandya for the respondent No.1.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the appeal filed by respondent No.1 under Section 17 of the Securitization and Rec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Ad Oza
Judges:
26 March, 2012·The petitioner has filed this Public Interest Litigation as he felt that inspite of large scale corruption, there is no proper investigation in the High Speed Diesel (HSD) scam involving officers and employees of the Government and Government Undertakings. The petitioner was not able to understand t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Man vs State
Judges:
26 March, 2012·Ms.Srushti A.Thula, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that the matter has been remanded by the Division Bench for fresh hearing and it has come to her notice that some of the respondents have expired, but she is unable to ascertain the correct facts.Issue Notice returnable on 27.04.2012.(...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vajshibhai vs State
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule returnable on 3.4.2012. Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule. State to verify the genuineness of the ground and the antecedents of the applicant - convict.(Jayant Patel, J.) (Paresh Upadhyay, J.) vinod Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Dharamshi
Judges:
26 March, 2012·At the request of learned Advocate for the appellant, matter is adjourned to 09.04.2012. In the meantime, Office is directed to call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Tribunal.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Civil Application No. 5570 Of 2 vs Rule Unserved For
Judges:
26 March, 2012·Present application has been preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay stating that there is a delay of 17 days in preferring Civil Revision Application (Stamp) No.901/2000. Reasons as to why Civil Revision Application (Stamp) No.901/2000 could not be filed in time are stated on oath by th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandrakant vs Director
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Learned advocate Mr.B.S. Patel appearing for the contesting respondents has filed undertaking on affidavit to the effect that only required number of members of the Managing Committee, permissible under the by-laws of the respective society will be exerc...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.