Ankitbhai vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Issue NOTICE to respondents returnable on 10.04.2012, on condition that the applicant deposits an amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with the registry of this Court to show his bonafide. Direct service is permitted through registered A.D. Post.Lea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhanaji vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Learned APP, Mr.Pandya, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.By way of this application, the applicant-convict has prayed for modification of condition imposed by this Court while enlarging the present applicant on temporary bail vid...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Vasantbhai
Judges:
27 March, 2012·This application is filed for substituted service on the respondents Nos.3 and 4. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant and having considered the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of paragraph 5(A), (B), (C) and (D).Office to issue fresh Rule in Civil Applicati...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Jaimini
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Gujarat State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd has made this Application requesting inter alia to implead the federation as party-respondent No.7 in Special Civil Application No.3599 of 2011, for the reasons narrated in the said application.Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and the resp...
High Court Of Gujarat
Komal vs Unknown
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1. Heard Mr.Pavan S. Godiawala, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.2. The present application is filed seeking dispensation of the meeting of equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant-company for considering and if thought fit with or without modification the scheme in th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mayur vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted as prayed for. This application stands disposed of as withdrawn.If trial is not over within six months, the applicant is at liberty to approach and in that event, it will be decided on its own meri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meenaben vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a sister of the husband of the complainant and resides separately with her family.Issue notice returnable on 10.4.2012.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dineshbhai vs Secretary
Judges:
27 March, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notice issued to respondent No.7 could not be served as the said respondent is stated to be out of station.Issue fresh notice to respondent No.7, making it returnable on 09.04.2012.Direct Service is permitted.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) (sunil) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhupatbhai vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·[1] Rule.Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent - State.[2] The applicants are charge sheeted for the offence punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 325, 504, 506(2), 403 of IPC as well as under section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. While relea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.