Umeshbhai vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Learned Counsel Mr. Rutul D. Kinariwala seeks permission to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant. He also seeks permission to file an affidavit on behalf of the complainant. Permission as prayed for is granted and the affidavit is ordered to be taken on record.This application is filed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mithakhali vs Ratilal
Judges:
27 March, 2012·The learned advocate for the petitioners prays for permission to add the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation as party-respondent No.12. Permission to do so is granted. The necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.List on 30.04.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) (sunil) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Metiya vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Notice returnable on 25.6.2012.(K.M.Thaker, J.) kdc Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aniruddhbhai vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition, at this stage, with a view to avail remedy available in accordance with law.Permission, as prayed for, is granted.This petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.Notice is discharged.However, it is made clear that this Cou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Rule. Mr Mangukiya, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance that although the petitioner has repaid the loan disbursed by the GSFC, the petitioner's original documents are not being returned to it on the ground of pendency of this petition. In support thereof, he produced a copy of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mr Md Pandya For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1.Heard learned counsel Mr. Hasim Qureshi for petitioner and learned counsel Mr. M.D. Pandya for respondent Gujarat Electricity Board, on caveat. Caveat stands disposed of.2.Upon consideration of the matter, following directions are issued:-2.1The petitioner do pay the remaining sum outstanding of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vishu vs Vijya
Judges:
27 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned counsel Mr. S.M. Shah appearing for respondent No.1 Bank states that the offer made by the petitioner under One Time Settlement Scheme on 31.3.2006 has been rejected by the Bank. He further submits that the other application made by the petitioner fo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arjunbhai vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 5.4.2012.Learned APP waives service on behalf of the State.Direct service is permitted qua the private respondent.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Siddiq vs Kasham
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1.0 This appeal is directed against the judgement and award dated 1st March 2000 passed by the learned Motor Vehicle Claims Tribunal (A) Godhra, Panchmahals in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.1281 of 1987 whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.15000/- along with interest at the rate of 12% pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Swami vs Manoj
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicant-original defendant no. 2-Society to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 21/09/2011 below Exhs. 13 and 14 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court at Ahme...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.